** REMINDER RETURNING OFFICIALS **
You need to have the new Crest on your sweater! If it’s not blue, no games for you!
What degree of force is necessary in order to be considered to be thrown dangerously into the boards?
USA Hockey youth games, the onus is on the player delivering the check
to do so in a manner that does not place the opponent in danger. Rule
purpose of a body check is to separate the opponent from the puck.
Anytime a player delivers a check for the purpose of intimidating or
punishing the opponent, and therefore causes the opponent to be driven
excessively into the boards (uses the boards to punish the opponent), a
boarding penalty must be assessed.
degree of force with the boards is certainly subject to discretion and a
more practical question may be “was the check necessary and/or what was
the vulnerability of the player being checked?” For example, a boarding
penalty may be assessed when a player was not necessarily hit that
hard,but was in a vulnerable position when unnecessarily hit with a
degree of force that caused them to be thrown into the boards
contrast, a penalty may not be warranted when a player is hit much
harder, but his preparedness for the hit causes him to go only mildly
into the boards.
Hockey is not eliminating a good, hard and clean check. However,
players must be aware of the situation when delivering a check and then
held accountable for taking “liberties” and therefore endangering an
player is skating behind an opponent as they head towards the end
boards. At the bottom of end zone face-off circle, the trailing player
trips the opponent and causes him to lose control and crash into the end
boards. May a boarding penalty be called in this instance?
Yes. Rule Reference 603(a).
boarding rule covers all potential illegal actions that causes an
opponent to dangerously contact the boards. Even though a tripping
penalty may also be appropriate, the boarding call is preferred to draw
attention to the more aggressive infraction.
is the USA Hockey interpretation of illegal body checking to a player
who is no longer in possession and control of the puck?
Any avoidable check delivered to a player who is no longer in possession and control of the puck. Rule Reference 640(b).
player is considered to still be in possession of the puck after he
releases it up until the point the puck is next played by another
player. An avoidable check delivered to a player after he has released
the puck must be penalized under this rule.
avoidable check is when the player delivering the check has an
opportunity to avoid contact once it is realized the opponent no longer
has possession and control of the puck.
concept of “finishing the check” is one that is meant to intimidate or
punish the opponent and has no place in youth hockey. Provided this
check is avoidable, it must be penalized in every instance.
**NOTE** Roughing is NOT a substitute for a Boarding call, please make the proper call!